Goodbye

Edit:
Please remove me as wiki admin and trello boards.
I may reconsider my position if this exegetic position from TMW changes.
Which means they can be used under GPL. Also, anything already released as GPL can of course still be used as GPL.Nard wrote:The contribs I made until this day are CC0 not GPL
I personally have NO care whether you quote my name or nick anywhere, and now I even prefer that you do not.one of my friends wrote:There was a discussion long ago about this licenses thing in a irc art channel and a guy said, "when you will be able to decompile my creativity and put it into source code then i will surely release my works under gpl, until then it's under something else :p"
Thank you and thank you for the censor ship again. you show how you admit contradiction.Crush wrote:I removed Nards administrator status from his wiki account as he requested.
Nard wrote:split from http://forums.themanaworld.org/viewtopi ... 13&t=17261
Goodbye
Edit:
Please remove me as wiki admin and trello boards.
I may reconsider my position if this exegetic position from TMW changes.
Nard wrote:Thank you and thank you for the censor ship again. you show how you admit contradiction.Crush wrote:I removed Nards administrator status from his wiki account as he requested.
If this thread derailed the responsible of it is the moderatorCrush wrote:Split some off-topic posts to http://forums.themanaworld.org/viewtopi ... =5&t=17365 - please do not derail this thread
@crush was this on topic?o11c wrote:[...]
url=http: //forums.themanaworld.org/ucp.php?i=zebra&mode=foes&add=Nard Following this link may help.
Question:Which license does Gnu recommend for free art or "other documents"?http://www.gnu.org/licenses/licenses.en.html wrote:This page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License.
Copyright Infringement Notification
Updated: $Date: 2013/02/28 17:09:29 $
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/licenses.en.html wrote:Licenses for Other Types of Works
We believe that published software and documentation should be free software and free documentation. We recommend making all sorts of educational and reference works free also, using free documentation licenses such as the GNU Free Documentation License (GNU FDL).
For essays of opinion and scientific papers, we recommend either theCreative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License, or the simple “verbatim copying only” license stated above.
We don't take the position that artistic or entertainment works must be free, but if you want to make one free, we recommend the Free Art License.
The problem is that whenever a thread happens, it's usually because that contributor is ragequitting. In this case, Nard is ragequitting after Crust deleted some spam posts that he tried to make to prove a (fallacious) point.Biquinho wrote:I'm not a contributor (yet?) and can't say anything about the reason why Nard is fed up, but what is really shocking me somehow, is the way how a contributor gets treated when (s)he leaves - I'm speaking in general since this is not the first thread I read about such an issue.
It's hard to do that since Nard has been very disruptive lately. He doesn't seem to be willing to talk about things; he's saying "do what I suggest, and screw the legal text".Biquinho wrote: I don't see a "let's talk about it again",
I don't see a "thank you the work you've done for TMW",
I don't see a "I feel sorry about our disagreements",
I don't see a "good luck for the future",
...I don't see any friendly words?
Nard did request that, and then immediately complained about it. I can't say this is really surprising, after the last few weeks.Biquinho wrote:I only see something like "ok, you go, I deleted your rights, bye".
Just follow some simple rules:Biquinho wrote:I'm getting worried reading this or similar threads.
If I really start contributing some things, will I be treated like this too?
Like being a nobody?