[Discussion] Disabeling summons in protectet areas
Forum rules
This forum houses many years of development, tracing back to some of the earliest posts that exist on the board.
Its current use is for the continued development of the server and game it has always served: TMW Classic.
Re: [Discussion] Disabeling summons in protectet areas
When you are so full of good suggestions why don't you fix the bugs then.
Fluffies behavior was changed to be slaves as well. Read and think before writing, otherwise you'll lose your credibility.
Fluffies behavior was changed to be slaves as well. Read and think before writing, otherwise you'll lose your credibility.
Re: [Discussion] Disabeling summons in protectet areas
Hey t3st3r =)
Here some details:
If you mean that summoned Fluffies don't attack other mobs:
As tux9th already wrote Fluffies will be slaves now too, meaning they will attack other mobs after summoning.
If you mean that Fluffies are peaceful mobs:
Even though Fluffies are usually non-aggro they will become aggressive after being hit and attacking the summoner or other players when the summoner changed the map - every summoned mob does, peaceful or aggressive.
Please keep in mind: this should just be temporary until MadCamel or o11c or maybe someone else "fixes" summoned mob's behavior (see their posts above)
Here some details:
Totally understand that *looks at her Fluffy Hat* and also already made this point but there is no other way at the moment.t3st3r wrote:So now I would be unable to summon even non-aggro and cute fluffies who were always a fun for years and never caused any trouble to anyone?
If you mean that summoned Fluffies don't attack other mobs:
As tux9th already wrote Fluffies will be slaves now too, meaning they will attack other mobs after summoning.
If you mean that Fluffies are peaceful mobs:
Even though Fluffies are usually non-aggro they will become aggressive after being hit and attacking the summoner or other players when the summoner changed the map - every summoned mob does, peaceful or aggressive.
Please keep in mind: this should just be temporary until MadCamel or o11c or maybe someone else "fixes" summoned mob's behavior (see their posts above)
Last edited by Cassy on 13 Sep 2013, 09:13, edited 1 time in total.
♡ Main characters:
Lv.94 - Cassy - speedarcher on dark path, bunny-wannabe, would like to ride on a Mouboo once...
Lv.95 - Biqcassy - mage on light path, addicted to her Fluffy Hat, love-hates Fallens, really misses Confused Tree...
Lv.70 - Simca. - dreams of becoming a speedarcher on light path, still has a lot to learn...
❀ Personal development overview | priorities | wiki to-do | wiki profile incl. other characters ✼
[20:24:59] <Cassy> debug npc in crypts!
[20:25:02] <Cassy> just a joke...
[20:25:08] <wushin> DONT DO THAT
[20:25:10] <o11c> !slap Cassy
Lv.94 - Cassy - speedarcher on dark path, bunny-wannabe, would like to ride on a Mouboo once...
Lv.95 - Biqcassy - mage on light path, addicted to her Fluffy Hat, love-hates Fallens, really misses Confused Tree...
Lv.70 - Simca. - dreams of becoming a speedarcher on light path, still has a lot to learn...
❀ Personal development overview | priorities | wiki to-do | wiki profile incl. other characters ✼
[20:24:59] <Cassy> debug npc in crypts!
[20:25:02] <Cassy> just a joke...
[20:25:08] <wushin> DONT DO THAT
[20:25:10] <o11c> !slap Cassy
- Chicka-Maria
- TMW Adviser
- Posts: 1562
- Joined: 19 Feb 2010, 02:10
- Location: Internet
Re: [Discussion] Disabeling summons in protectet areas
Since magic summons are being disabled I'm guessing @spawn command parties will be as well in those areas? People use those spells to fight and have fun with spawn parties that GMs might host, the Gms spawn parties can kill afk players as well.
regards,
regards,
Yubaba
TMWC Member of The Mana World
Leader of The Mana Empire (TME)
[19:41] Ladysugar: he told me to push a setzer up his rear
www.deviantart.com/comfycheeks - Old Deviant Art
TMWC Member of The Mana World
Leader of The Mana Empire (TME)
[19:41] Ladysugar: he told me to push a setzer up his rear
www.deviantart.com/comfycheeks - Old Deviant Art
William James wrote:Act as If what you do make's a difference, because It does.
Re: [Discussion] Disabeling summons in protectet areas
The fact I admit that "using guillotine is not the best way to cure headache" does not implies I can readily offer other cure from headache. But as for me I would rather prefer to live with headache rather than use "superb solution" with guillotine, thank you very much. Sorry, but inability to cast my favorite fluffies spell I used for years would hardly count as "reward" for reporting this bug. Also bunch of mages now haves a perfectly valid reason to hate me for such bug report and resulting "fix" since it ruins half of fun in game. Needless to say it really discourages me from future bug reports and/or further attempts to point out common issues and annoyances I can find as player.tux9th wrote:When you are so full of good suggestions why don't you fix the bugs then.
Fluffies behavior was changed to be slaves as well. Read and think before writing, otherwise you'll lose your credibility.
I dont see why slaves should attack other players on non-PvP maps unless players do something offensive as well (like stabbing monster, using own slaves to attack it, aggravate spell, etc).Cassy wrote:As tux9th already wrote Fluffies will be slaves now too, meaning they will attack other mobs after summoning.
I fail to undestand what's the problem here. If player provokes monster, it supposed to defend self and it's standard part of PvE gameplay. Since player have to explicitly initiate this action self, it does not allows to kill AFK players, no? So what's the problem with it?they will become aggressive after being hit and attacking the summoner or other players when the summoner changed the map
Oh yeah, I remember another story. TMWAthena meant to be some "temporary" server until ManaServ is able to do it. So where is ManaServ, huh? And what are all these mumblings like "Manasource devs do not really care about this server"? You see, the most persistent things in the world are some "temporary" solutions. Whole existence of this world with TMWAthena is a good example of this fact. So I would not take this phrase seriously, sorry .Please keep in mind: this should just be temporary until MadCamel or o11c or maybe someone else "fixes" summoned mob's behavior (see their posts above)
.Chicka-Maria wrote:Since magic summons are being disabled I'm guessing @spawn command parties will be as well in those areas?
Oh yeah. Let GMs to feel the same as players. At least it would be fair . Also, server should be unable to spawn monsters on these maps as well, to make "solution" perfect
Re: [Discussion] Disabeling summons in protectet areas
I picked this topic up because it seemed to me like summoned spawns are a problem. With the current mob behaviour it is possible to aggravate friendly spawned mobs and make them attack anything on the map, regardless of PvP flag.
GMs and players in game told me that this is a problem and people are being harassed with spawned mobs that way.
About GM spawns:
GMs are still free to spawn mobs with the @spawn command, simply because they do it to make the game more fun. I have never seen a GM who walks up to a player then spawns 5 aggro mobs on him and watches him get slaughtered by those mobs and then does this over again.
Through the voice of the GMs it seemed as this was an immediate issue which should be fixed asap. I asked if it would be a good fix to simply disable the summons for the time being until we have a different mob behaviour. They said it would be fine. We discussed this in the development channel of IRC as well.
That's why I brought this forward and people liked the idea (outside this topic), hence I patched the spells and put it up on the testing server for review and testing.
I am a content developer mostly specialised in mapping. I cannot edit the mob behaviour since I am not trained in C / C++ coding. Thus I make an immediate fix which solves most of the problem presented by my peers. Once we have a change in summoned mob behaviour will be re-enabled as they pose no harm any more.
Now to you t3st3r. You seem to not grasp the situation correctly:
All mobs which are summoned by spells, will attack you (regardless of their nature) if you attack them. If their target disappears, they don't simply stop attacking but attack other PCs and Mobs which are around. This is a problem.
Personal attacks won't make your arguments better or give them more meaning but will make it less likely anyone is going to react to them. Please keep the discussion simple and objective. I do not have any personal issues with you and I am not doing anything with the sole purpose to upset you. Keep this in mind when writing your next post.
regards
tux9th
GMs and players in game told me that this is a problem and people are being harassed with spawned mobs that way.
About GM spawns:
GMs are still free to spawn mobs with the @spawn command, simply because they do it to make the game more fun. I have never seen a GM who walks up to a player then spawns 5 aggro mobs on him and watches him get slaughtered by those mobs and then does this over again.
Through the voice of the GMs it seemed as this was an immediate issue which should be fixed asap. I asked if it would be a good fix to simply disable the summons for the time being until we have a different mob behaviour. They said it would be fine. We discussed this in the development channel of IRC as well.
That's why I brought this forward and people liked the idea (outside this topic), hence I patched the spells and put it up on the testing server for review and testing.
I am a content developer mostly specialised in mapping. I cannot edit the mob behaviour since I am not trained in C / C++ coding. Thus I make an immediate fix which solves most of the problem presented by my peers. Once we have a change in summoned mob behaviour will be re-enabled as they pose no harm any more.
Now to you t3st3r. You seem to not grasp the situation correctly:
All mobs which are summoned by spells, will attack you (regardless of their nature) if you attack them. If their target disappears, they don't simply stop attacking but attack other PCs and Mobs which are around. This is a problem.
Personal attacks won't make your arguments better or give them more meaning but will make it less likely anyone is going to react to them. Please keep the discussion simple and objective. I do not have any personal issues with you and I am not doing anything with the sole purpose to upset you. Keep this in mind when writing your next post.
regards
tux9th
Re: [Discussion] Disabeling summons in protectet areas
The GM spawn parties are done differently, though. There's no sense in spawning monsters if no one is around to kill them. The players fighting those monsters are basically defending the AFK players. Not to mention that technically, we could clean up afterwards in a way, doing @revive on dead players. This hasn't been done, of course, but it could be.
Personally, as a player, I'm not a huge fan of spawn parties being done in towns, but I do them anyway, because players themselves seem to like them, and they're the most convenient place for such activities as there's always someone around.
But the main issue that sparked this discussion wasn't the killing of AFK players, but rather targeting newbie players in and around Tulimshar. And as far as I know, none of the GMs do spawn parties there.
I think the cleanest solution to this issue would be to make spawns attack their summoner if he attacks them, but if he runs away, make them disappear. It could be easily explained with something like:
I know the example I provided here is simplified, and doesn't allow for PvP use in PvP areas, but that behaviour could be expanded with adding more flags to the AI of summoned mobs.
Finally, we only had one isolated incident of the summoned monsters being misused. I don't expect to see an epidemic of this anytime soon. Most of the players seem to dislike the use of summoned mobs in that fashion, and those who don't have probably been discouraged by the incident with Ulith (TroLL).
Don't rush into a "fix" which will piss everyone off. There's no immediate threat to the player base right now.
tux9th, I've seen how eager you were to bring in the evil magic, and I'm pretty everyone else was looking forward to the magic expansions, as well. It didn't work out as planned, but most things don't. In an open world, it's hard to predict what players might or might not do. Giving something out only to take it away a week later is a bad policy.
Do you know why #kaflosh doesn't work in towns? Because of me.
They took the easy way out. They disabled the rain spell in towns.
I don't want to see a repeat of that. Removing something because no one had time to change how it works is ridiculous. The reason I'm writing this is the fact that these "temporary" fixes end up being permanent solutions as the issues get forgotten or swept under the rug. This whole game in fact is a temporary thing that ended up being permanent. eAthena was just supposed to be a playground to test content before the "real" server was finished. Instead, the devs ended up with a game on their hands. I think it's time to stop fixing things in such a way.
Personally, as a player, I'm not a huge fan of spawn parties being done in towns, but I do them anyway, because players themselves seem to like them, and they're the most convenient place for such activities as there's always someone around.
But the main issue that sparked this discussion wasn't the killing of AFK players, but rather targeting newbie players in and around Tulimshar. And as far as I know, none of the GMs do spawn parties there.
I think the cleanest solution to this issue would be to make spawns attack their summoner if he attacks them, but if he runs away, make them disappear. It could be easily explained with something like:
- Summoned creatures exist through the will of the caster
- Once the caster attacks them, they're not sustained by the caster's will, but by their wrath caused by betrayal
- With the caster gone, they have nothing to keep them in this world anymore, and they disappear
I know the example I provided here is simplified, and doesn't allow for PvP use in PvP areas, but that behaviour could be expanded with adding more flags to the AI of summoned mobs.
Finally, we only had one isolated incident of the summoned monsters being misused. I don't expect to see an epidemic of this anytime soon. Most of the players seem to dislike the use of summoned mobs in that fashion, and those who don't have probably been discouraged by the incident with Ulith (TroLL).
Don't rush into a "fix" which will piss everyone off. There's no immediate threat to the player base right now.
tux9th, I've seen how eager you were to bring in the evil magic, and I'm pretty everyone else was looking forward to the magic expansions, as well. It didn't work out as planned, but most things don't. In an open world, it's hard to predict what players might or might not do. Giving something out only to take it away a week later is a bad policy.
Do you know why #kaflosh doesn't work in towns? Because of me.
I kept doing the spell over and over again, because I wanted people to complain. I wasn't just creating lag for others, I was lagging myself — like crazy. The half-baked implementation was causing problems and I wanted the devs to fix it. I have tried talking to them, but that didn't work, so instead, I opted for making everyone miserable until something was done about it.[2009-09-18 12:30:48] 009-1.gat(49,33) Delasia : @t Melkior people have asked you to stop because of the lag in Hurnscald caused by rain, i have requested you stop, You have done neither.
[2009-09-18 12:43:57] 009-1.gat(50,37) Delasia : @t Melkior you were warned about the rain
[2009-09-18 12:44:00] 009-1.gat(50,37) Delasia : @kick Melkior
[2009-09-18 12:45:55] 009-1.gat(52,34) Delasia : @t Melkior you were kicked as the next warning step
They took the easy way out. They disabled the rain spell in towns.
I don't want to see a repeat of that. Removing something because no one had time to change how it works is ridiculous. The reason I'm writing this is the fact that these "temporary" fixes end up being permanent solutions as the issues get forgotten or swept under the rug. This whole game in fact is a temporary thing that ended up being permanent. eAthena was just supposed to be a playground to test content before the "real" server was finished. Instead, the devs ended up with a game on their hands. I think it's time to stop fixing things in such a way.
Re: [Discussion] Disabeling summons in protectet areas
If you don't want my immediate fix then I won't add one. I thought this was a problem. Maybe I was misinformed.
Don't come to me for a "fix" though. I cannot give you one.
regards
Don't come to me for a "fix" though. I cannot give you one.
regards
Re: [Discussion] Disabeling summons in protectet areas
They are, because ability of one player to PK other players without chance to give retribution is wrong, its "griefing" and can make players to leave the game. However, proposed fix also "unpleasant", to say the least.tux9th wrote:I picked this topic up because it seemed to me like summoned spawns are a problem.
Because many players started griefing others, abusing bug. I've considered it a heavy gameplay issue, so I filed bug report to forum. Most RPGs would qualify it like this. And from your words it looks like if it's even somewhat worse than I thought.Through the voice of the GMs it seemed as this was an immediate issue which should be fixed asap.
But btw, from your words looks like if real issue is how server deals with sudden loss of target/caster/etc. Thanks to your words I have been able to figure out some other bugs were a mere manifestation of this (or similar) issue. So there are ways to play nasty pranks on unsuspecting travellers. Now I can imagine even more bugs. Yet I'm afraid to report them for the sake of gameplay, since if they all would be "fixed" I'm afraid to imagine what players would be allowed to do.
Also, I think there should be disconnection delay for characters. About 20-60 seconds, where server helds character on battlefield, even if connection lost or exit requested. Lack of delay on exit allows players to escape dangerous places when things go rough, bypass spellcasting cooldown times, get rid of unwanted effects/spells and do a bunch of other interesting bugging/cheating which should not be possible or at least convenient, actually. Oh, pretty please, do not disable all connections to server to fix it .
I guess such "fix" would upset quite many people, not just me. Breaking one part of gameplay to fix another is not what would be warmly welcomed by players. In fact I learned about this topic from another unhappy player. But ok, I would try to avoid personal attacks. And if fact I'm rather unhappy with overall bugs handling in TMW, not this one particular fix and I havent meant to offend you personally, so if it feels like this, I'm sorry about that. For some reason it just seems to be some "default TMWC policy" to handle most of things like this. Thats what makes me unhappy, actually.Personal attacks won't make your arguments better or give them more meaning but will make it less likely anyone is going to react to them. Please keep the discussion simple and objective. I do not have any personal issues with you and I am not doing anything with the sole purpose to upset you. Keep this in mind when writing your next post.
That's how things in TMW are getting "fixed". Same happened to guilds, etc . Oh, and botstacks were "fixed" by disabling autofollow in rules. Yet another "simple fix". Hopefully it explains a bit why I'm so hostile to such "fixes".melkior wrote:I kept doing the spell over and over again, because I wanted people to complain. I wasn't just creating lag for others, I was lagging myself — like crazy. The half-baked implementation was causing problems and I wanted the devs to fix it. I have tried talking to them, but that didn't work, so instead, I opted for making everyone miserable until something was done about it.
They took the easy way out. They disabled the rain spell in towns.
Re: [Discussion] Disabeling summons in protectet areas
t3st3r, I understand you're unhappy with how this is handled.
Can you suggest how to fix the situation?
Can you suggest how to fix the situation?
You earn respect by how you live, not by what you demand.
-unknown
-unknown
Re: [Discussion] Disabeling summons in protectet areas
Aggro mobs? No. Mobs that will leave you with nightmares forever?tux9th wrote: About GM spawns:
GMs are still free to spawn mobs with the @spawn command, simply because they do it to make the game more fun. I have never seen a GM who walks up to a player then spawns 5 aggro mobs on him and watches him get slaughtered by those mobs and then does this over again.
Nothing can compare to the horror of falling asleep in a barren cave and waking up in the middle of a field of flowers!
(Since people seem to be fond of misunderstanding, that was sarcasm. If you think that this ruins the humor, then please do something about the *real* problem.)
Former programmer for the TMWA server.
Re: [Discussion] Disabeling summons in protectet areas
I can remember illia quest can track player disappearance, unlike many other scripts (what causes a lot of interesting bugs). Could someting like this be used to remove offending monsters from map? Or there is some trouble on this way? Needless to say proper solution is to handle such cases correctly, not work them around.Frost wrote:t3st3r, I understand you're unhappy with how this is handled.
Can you suggest how to fix the situation?
Re: [Discussion] Disabeling summons in protectet areas
Monsters are *nothing* like players.
Former programmer for the TMWA server.
Re: [Discussion] Disabeling summons in protectet areas
But I offered to detect player disappearance and then remove player's minoins from map. Not just it would be logical (it's usual when minions disappear together with master). It also could fix a number of other funny bugs (which I'm not going to report directly, to avoid more similar "fixes" wrecking gameplay and fun further).o11c wrote:Monsters are *nothing* like players.
Re: [Discussion] Disabeling summons in protectet areas
I think we discussed this matter enough and are through.
We will not disable summon spells in protected areas thus no need of keeping this alive. Hopefully we can fix the mob behaviour within a reasonable time frame.
with best regards
tux9th
could a Mod lock this topic please.
We will not disable summon spells in protected areas thus no need of keeping this alive. Hopefully we can fix the mob behaviour within a reasonable time frame.
with best regards
tux9th
could a Mod lock this topic please.
Re: [Discussion] Disabeling summons in protectet areas
Locked.
- former Manasource Programmer
- former TMW Pixel artist
- NOT a game master
Please do not send me any inquiries regarding player accounts on TMW.
You might have heard a certain rumor about me. This rumor is completely false. You might also have heard the other rumor about me. This rumor is 100% accurate.