Page 3 of 5
Posted: 26 Mar 2005, 23:23
I think the above logos are still a bit too complicated. Building on the work of iru, I have simplified it somewhat:
And then added some fancyness again:
Bigger with titles: (though sure, it's the wrong title, but that's a side effect...)
Aacheron liked it a bit greener:
Posted: 27 Mar 2005, 07:15
I do like it. its perfect material for logo IMO.
Posted: 27 Mar 2005, 23:52
maybe it isnt finished, but it's my conception... what do u think?
Posted: 28 Mar 2005, 00:46
awesome, the one above has my vote. That's really cool.
Posted: 28 Mar 2005, 02:27
ooh, i think thats much nicer. The color scheme is more suitable imo
Another thing, maybe the world should have some water and ice caps too
Posted: 28 Mar 2005, 09:13
Ok it seems we're on the right path =)
I like the world part as it is now, still doubtful about theshape around it, probably it's the skin and the rotation too, maybe changing the angle could make the trick
Posted: 28 Mar 2005, 10:41
a bit shaded, is now more 3d. any ideas?
Posted: 28 Mar 2005, 11:32
Can you please try a different color combination?
I'd like a darker green for the world, and maybe some wooden color for the shape around it...
Posted: 28 Mar 2005, 12:24
Posted: 28 Mar 2005, 12:32
the second one !
Posted: 28 Mar 2005, 13:03
yeah i agree, the second one!
Posted: 28 Mar 2005, 13:11
maybe. I still wait for Rotonen's and Hammebear's opinion in this case.
Posted: 28 Mar 2005, 13:40
The first one.
Posted: 28 Mar 2005, 18:21
I have to say I much prefer the original green/gold coloring.
Posted: 28 Mar 2005, 19:13
Catfish_Man wrote:I have to say I much prefer the original green/gold coloring.
Likewise; the ice-blue teal colour feels too cold; the world's supposed to be a generally "average" world, not an ice-world. I more like the warm glow of green on this one