http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5_EIikdFr8Big Crunch wrote: I like long walks on the beach, pina coladas, and getting caught in the rain. I like making love at midnight in the dunes of the cape.
Thanks Frost for explanation
This forum is for feature requests, content changes additions, anything not a Bug in the software.
Please report all bugs on the Support Forums
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5_EIikdFr8Big Crunch wrote: I like long walks on the beach, pina coladas, and getting caught in the rain. I like making love at midnight in the dunes of the cape.
I think for a senior player, it should be automatic, no player vote, no TMWC approval. Sort of like the current "20-post voting for GM" rule is now, but with a higher bar of entry. It should be what a senior player is entitled, unless he is a rule-breaker or major disruptive force, in which case, he will already have accumulated infractions (on either game, forum, or both) which could disqualify him.Nard wrote:I am also an adept of "counter power": I mean that the best decisions result from debates where contradiction is allowed. If members are chosen among people who mostly agree with the existing comittee... :/
UNOblackrazor wrote:I think for a senior player, it should be automatic, no player vote, no TMWC approval. Sort of like the current "20-post voting for GM" rule is now, but with a higher bar of entry. It should be what a senior player is entitled, unless he is a rule-breaker or major disruptive force, in which case, he will already have accumulated infractions (on either game, forum, or both) which could disqualify him.Nard wrote:I am also an adept of "counter power": I mean that the best decisions result from debates where contradiction is allowed. If members are chosen among people who mostly agree with the existing comittee... :/
For a player representative, it is completely different. Here the fellow players must be able to vote for him. I further suggest term limits, to ensure that our player representatives are most representative of the players they currently represent. Since they represent the players, I see no reason for a TMWC approval, although if the candidates are rule-breakers, that could disqualify them as a special case. Also, if you allow a TMWC veto, then maybe we could use the USA veto system for governors and presidents, which does allow a veto, but the originating body (legislature, congress, ... players) can override it with a high enough majority. I know the USA uses this system to allow, but also to balance, veto powers; perhaps other countries and organizations do it as well.