Platyna was not offered a GM position. She was put up for nomination, which is a totally different thing. There, she would have to win 75% of the YES votes, and 60 YES votes. Now I'm not saying it should be any different for Platyna, but to use that as proof that she was offered a position is disingenuous.Cassy wrote:Frost wrote:http://forums.themanaworld.org/viewtopi ... 95#p132395Platyna wrote: You underestood wrong. I do repeat: I was never offered any position in TMWC. I have learned that TMWC exists from a forum post, while being kicked out of my own irc channel and having all my powers removed. IT WAS ALL PLOTTED AGAINST ME ON A SECRET CHANNEL!
I explain: You wrote you were never offered any position in TMWC.
Frost posted a link where you have been offered a position in TMWC, as GM.
What I don't like about all of this, is that to some people the TMWC look like bad people because of this.
I can tell you guys that they are very nice people.
In any case, I think Frost posted that link to try and show that what Platyna wanted was her old position back, as top-admin. Which is not as radical as it might seem, since there was no clear method within the project before to remove a top-admin against their will (whether they receive an email or not). So everyone was really in uncharted waters, as far as TMW rulings were concerned, when Platyna was removed against her will, and she wanted that decision reversed.
In the past, as supported by the links the administration gave in this thread: http://forums.themanaworld.org/viewtopi ... 1&start=99, if someone high-up in the administration (top-admin, department admin, senior developer) had a serious problem with a co-worker, they were the ones to personally decide to stay or go. Never before had they instead decided to throw out a fellow high-up co-worker or even a higher ranking admin, against their will.
Anyways, this is not about bad or good. Perhaps fair or not fair, right or wrong, due process or not due process ... but seriously, don't try to make it personal by pasting a bad or good label on it.