Platyna woke up...
> that he doesn't have a time to work for TMW.
I've seen you about 3...5 times in game in 4+ years I play TMW. I think I've seen o11c more than that in last few months already, even if he is really inactive as player. I can also assure you he gave players chance to learn he is here and writes code
. This makes some further statements quite funny.
> AFAIR the main argument for that take-over was that I don't have time for the project (and I wasn't a developer).
See above.
> * our player base decreased by half,
IIRC decline started before move.
> * people stop playing after level 20,
Unreliable statement - how did you measured that?
. And there was no major changes - why blame TMWC/o11c/whoever?
> * people think that o11c is the only committee member left,
He could be strange and some of his actions could be unexpected. But at least he can be argued with, can explain his actions and last time he caused chaos, he did really impressive bugfixing.
> * sycophants of current regime are spreading that I was bad example of an admin and very abusive (sic!),
I have something to say in this regard. I've done grepping all available GM logs, searching for all items introduced by rogue commands as I've been curious of some items origin. Unexpected side effect: YOU have earned #1 rank in abusing @item command. You have been the only person who dared to create something like banshee bow for self with @item rather than honestly complete Illia quest. Others devs/admins/... are/were more fair in this regard and resorted to worthless items for test purposes and only created expensive items as replacement of items lost due to technical issues.
> * current GMs take my quotes out of context to justify the putsch.
Your signature beats any quotes any time of day. Really uncommon way to admit you're systems administrator.
> it isn't worth to put the time in if no one will be using it.
Unique chance to prove your community management skills you've told about.
> our server added to 4144's client list we got refused and he tried to force us to change the name of the server
> because o11c will dislike the current name.
Lol, 4144 is not "overlord" for sure. From my experience he is always constructive, helpful and IMHO 4144 is really pleasant to deal with. So if you failed to find acceptable resolution I'll have hard time considering its 4144's fault.