Sorry, another thread about licences.
So Chicka-Maria, 4144 and me just had a discussion about following issue:
Chicka-Maria wanted her most recent creation to be CC BY-NC-SA-3.0, meaning
However, TMW only allows CC-BY-SA-3.0 + GPLv2 - same as above except for the noncommercial use part.http://creativecommons.org wrote:You are free:
Under the following conditions:
- to Share — to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to Remix — to adapt the work
- Attribution — You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).
- Noncommercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes.
- Share Alike — If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one.
Shouldn't it be fine to also allow CC-BY-NC-SA-3.0 only?
On a personal point of view:
Of course I'm not sure if I understood correctly, but to me CC-BY-NC-SA-3.0 looks fine as it seems to cover everything TMW wants.
As a pixel artist I don't care that much, but if I created music like Chicka-Maria does (actually I once did pretty much so I understand very well), I wouldn't like the idea of other people being allowed to make money with my music.
*hopes she understood*