And the problem with that is some don't. You always need to take the some into account when writing something. Omitting people from a guide is a bad idea. Guichan is not backwards compatible, and will overwrite whatever is already installed on Ubuntu, thus causing other packages that use, say 0.7.1, to break.Shaili (a.k.a. tds) wrote:You can just synchronize the repo with new packages. All updates will come with synaptic. I didn't have this problem anyway. Don't forget that many people use guichan only for tmw
Using 0.0.28.1 with WINE
- kr0n05931
- Knight
- Posts: 652
- Joined: 26 Jul 2008, 01:59
- Location: United Socialist States of America
- Contact:
Re: Using 0.0.28 with WINE
Lazy bum.
- Shaili (a.k.a. tds)
- Novice
- Posts: 168
- Joined: 20 Feb 2008, 10:50
- Contact:
Re: Using 0.0.28 with WINE
Sorry I didn't know all those problems since I never noticed them ^^'
Re: Using 0.0.28.1 with WINE
That's why I prefer rolling release. Easier for everyone.
For example: I run Archlinux, which is rolling release. and then type "pacman -S tmw" on a terminal or vc and it'll get installing the lastest version on the repositories. Thanks to ABS (Arch Build System), you can make a simple PKGBUILD to compile the lastest version avaible and so, then install with pacman.
Ubuntu is too bloated for my likeness. Even if my Linux way started near there, it went to trash soon.
For example: I run Archlinux, which is rolling release. and then type "pacman -S tmw" on a terminal or vc and it'll get installing the lastest version on the repositories. Thanks to ABS (Arch Build System), you can make a simple PKGBUILD to compile the lastest version avaible and so, then install with pacman.
Ubuntu is too bloated for my likeness. Even if my Linux way started near there, it went to trash soon.
Arch64 - We power it
Nickname: Alxe
Nickname: Alxe
Re: Using 0.0.28.1 with WINE
The problem in rolling release distributions lies in you having to constantly reconfigure stuff due to configuration file syntax changes.
This message used to be meaningful.
Re: Using 0.0.28.1 with WINE
Not really... maybe when a package update is a major one, but I doubt, I never had to touch anything, not even for the kernel. Just recompile it, and that's done during installation.Rotonen wrote:The problem in rolling release distributions lies in you having to constantly reconfigure stuff due to configuration file syntax changes.
Arch64 - We power it
Nickname: Alxe
Nickname: Alxe
Re: Using 0.0.28.1 with WINE
And you've had the same install without clean reinstalls for over five years how many times?Alxe wrote:Not really... maybe when a package update is a major one, but I doubt, I never had to touch anything, not even for the kernel. Just recompile it, and that's done during installation.Rotonen wrote:The problem in rolling release distributions lies in you having to constantly reconfigure stuff due to configuration file syntax changes.
This message used to be meaningful.
Re: Using 0.0.28.1 with WINE
Point for you.Rotonen wrote:And you've had the same install without clean reinstalls for over five years how many times?Alxe wrote:Not really... maybe when a package update is a major one, but I doubt, I never had to touch anything, not even for the kernel. Just recompile it, and that's done during installation.Rotonen wrote:The problem in rolling release distributions lies in you having to constantly reconfigure stuff due to configuration file syntax changes.
Arch64 - We power it
Nickname: Alxe
Nickname: Alxe