Page 2 of 2

Re: Gms' commands question.

Posted: 03 Aug 2011, 06:33
by OnymA
:twisted: :roll: :cry: :P :oops: :mrgreen: :lol: :( 8) :arrow: :shock: :|
BIG CRUNCH is an evil lamb ABUSER
8) :arrow: :shock: :| :twisted: :roll: :cry: :P :oops: :mrgreen: :lol: :(
[2010-12-13 22:46:58] 009-1.gat(28,39) Big Crunch(2160466) :
@localbroadcast The person that kills lamb gets 50k
:oops: :mrgreen: :lol: :( 8) :arrow: :shock: :| :twisted: :roll: :cry: :P


I want PUNISHMENT !!!!!! >;o

Re: Gms' commands question.

Posted: 03 Aug 2011, 19:57
by DarkWater
meway wrote:
DW it is not polite to call out people in mid topic. If you have Concerns make a new topic and pm the person in question.
I am not polite ever, which is why I left my old guild, they wanted mindless support of the group holding power, regardless of what is right and wrong. And I will call out someone that suppose to be a developer trolling the forums. Developers should not be allowed to troll. His post was specifically created to discredit the op, misdirect validate questioning of gm power, and disrupt the conversation of this topic. He is trying to defend his friend, big crunch, but in the end is dragging the fight back to his door step.

If I was a developer or even supporting the current group holding power, I would just step in line and go with the sheep, but right is right and wrong is wrong. Frost is a developer but acting like a 7 year old child. If he wants to personally attack dayve, accuse innocent people that perceive a unjust act, and defend his friend, he needs to either give up the developer title or needs to step back in line with the rest of the herd.

When a developer speaks out like frost did, it creates a perception of the developers as a whole. This perception is passed onto the gm's, the admins, and the game command structure.

From one person that still cares for you frost, you are not an attack dog, you are making the game, the group holding power, and the gm's you are protecting look very bad.

Once again, gm's, developers, and admins CAN NOT TROLL. Which is the crux of the topic we are talking about meway. BC will not man up and step up explaining why he is using this power, which is a non-subject. Frost stepped into troll and misdirected the attack, but never directly addressing the the topic at hand. You have not spoken out about that behavior meway. Why is that? Frost directly trolled in this subject and you remained silent about that, but accuse me of misdirection.

Bottom line, I left the old group because they cared more about supporting the current group holding power then what is right and wrong. They proved this when they allowed the current developers to troll my friends and family. The current trolling behavior by the developers is continuing both in the game and on the forums. As long as we are the the subject of abuse and perceptions of the gms abusing power, we also need to focus on the fact that developers are actively trolling people and forcing people to leave this game.


Meway, abuse, whether it is from the developers, gm's, or admins, is abuse, which is the main topic of this thread. By ignoring one form of abuse because he is supporting the current group holding power, is just wrong.

Two things should happen.

1.) BC needs to explain his behavior from an official point of view.
2.) Frost needs to start acting like a developer and either step in line or give up the title.

Re: Gms' commands question.

Posted: 03 Aug 2011, 20:07
by Alige
DarkWater wrote:Once again, gm's, developers, and admins CAN NOT TROLL.
We can. Being a developer, a gm or an admin doesn't mean you can't be sarcastic or anything. I'm trolling every day in game and I never heard any complaints.
DarkWater wrote:2.) Frost needs to start acting like a developer and either step in line or give up the title.
I personally never saw Frost acting like an idiot, he maybe sees things from a different point of view than you DarkWater, that's all.

I may be wrong, who knows.

Re: Gms' commands question.

Posted: 03 Aug 2011, 21:46
by meway
She's wrong, misleading, inappropriate and is accusing me and others for seemingly the hell of it. I'm done with this discussion PM's please. I pm'ed you please return the favor.

Re: Gms' commands question.

Posted: 04 Aug 2011, 01:47
by Big Crunch
DarkWater wrote:BC will not man up and step up explaining why he is using this power, which is a non-subject.
?

Re: Gms' commands question.

Posted: 04 Aug 2011, 02:08
by meway
Big Crunch wrote:
DarkWater wrote:BC will not man up and step up explaining why he is using this power, which is a non-subject.
?
I would like to point this out. It is not a "power" It is a tool not intended to inconvenience anyone and it hasn't as long as they followed the rules.