What needs to change?

[Dimond]

Hi...

-Dimond

[Amun]

Hi...

-Dimond

AHHHH no escape.......

[Rotonen]

This is not an association. This is a loose group or random people developing a game.

[Booth]

Is it possible that we could just make sure two GM's are present before banning someone without cause and giving them thier reason for banning. Also, if the GM's don't want us doing something then they should add it to the rules. The two GM's i don't mean doors and Delasia like Delasia and another GM or doors and another GM just to make things fair.

[Katze]

Is it possible that we could just make sure two GM's are present before banning someone without cause and giving them thier reason for banning. Also, if the GM's don't want us doing something then they should add it to the rules. The two GM's i don't mean doors and Delasia like Delasia and another GM or doors and another GM just to make things fair.

That's a kind of strange suggestion. If you think the two of them should be monitored by other GMs...well...what use would they be?

[Booth]

well, i mean if theres 2 that agree on the subject then they could ban. But one by itself can't unless the person is clearly botting or something near that category.

[Katze]

Well, about botting: that is really not hard to check. There are very clear rules and bot cases didn't cause any problems recently. What is more difficult are interpersonal matters...

[Black Don]

All I have to say is that the definition of flaming seems to be directed at anyone who disagrees with each other. Most often however, flames are angry or insulting messages transmitted by people who have strong feelings about a subject.