Re: User Groups
Posted: 30 Apr 2013, 23:06
When was the last time you contributed?meway wrote:So I am a committee member?Crush wrote:The active content developers should now all be committee members.
Feel the mana power growing inside you!
https://forums.themanaworld.org/
When was the last time you contributed?meway wrote:So I am a committee member?Crush wrote:The active content developers should now all be committee members.
Not all active content developers are committee members, if that was the impression, that was a misunderstanding.meway wrote:So I am a committee member?Crush wrote:The active content developers should now all be committee members.
That was a big ass commit and allot of my time. I try to contribute things when I have a chance and I'm pretty active here on the forums. Just because I didn't apply something to git does not mean I haven't made a contribution. Its not fair that you would say that.Jenalya wrote:Not all active content developers are committee members, if that was the impression, that was a misunderstanding.meway wrote:So I am a committee member?Crush wrote:The active content developers should now all be committee members.
Regarding meway being active, as I already said it's difficult to draw the line between active and inactive devs, and between contributor and developer. But given that meway's latest contribution I'm aware of is from October 2011 (https://github.com/themanaworld/tmwa-se ... e0687686f0) I tend to see him as inactive. Of course there was some activity in the form of giving advice regarding pixelart and similiar...
Does that mean that we need another forum group "developers" between contributors and committee members? When that's the case, please send me a PM with the member lists.Jenalya wrote:Not all active content developers are committee members, if that was the impression, that was a misunderstanding.
I didn't say you were not active. I said I tend not to see you as active developer. You've been very active in posting in the forums, talking in irc, and in starting things, but you rarely get something to the point being actually useable in the game. And what's in the git history is what is being used in the game.meway wrote: There was allot of time and effort put into each and every one of these things and I don't appreciate you saying I haven't been active since 2011 based off of one link.
I don't think we need a separate group. Developers are a special case of contributors, so I don't think it's a problem to have them in the same group. That solves the problem to define a clear line between being a contributor and becoming a developer, and keeping a group up-to-date about how active someone is.Crush wrote:Does that mean that we need another forum group "developers" between contributors and committee members? When that's the case, please send me a PM with the member lists.Jenalya wrote:Not all active content developers are committee members, if that was the impression, that was a misunderstanding.
Who would you consider your most active graphic pixelartists?Jenalya wrote:I didn't say you were not active. I said I tend not to see you as active developer. You've been very active in posting in the forums, talking in irc, and in starting things, but you rarely get something to the point being actually useable in the game. And what's in the git history is what is being used in the game.meway wrote: There was allot of time and effort put into each and every one of these things and I don't appreciate you saying I haven't been active since 2011 based off of one link.
Writing tutorials is surely something that can help the project, but it's not actually developing. If you want to be considered an active developer, get things done.We're really in need for pixelartists, especially tileset artists, and some of the things you started to work on look really promising! But if you don't finish it, it's useless.
![]()
So go ahead and create something that gets used in the game, and I'll call you an active developer.
meway wrote: https://github.com/Meway/tmwa-server-data
Also after these posts:TMW Committee wrote:TMWC Advisors are those contributors or GHP members that have stepped away from the game or development, yet offer insight, advice and/or periodic assistance with game decisions and development, while not directly taking decisions.
and:Bjorn wrote:The Mana project was split off from the TMW project back in 2009, with the goal of continuing development of the client and server software, which were until then developed as part of The Mana World. In doing so it enables other games to be based on the same platform.
and considering that manasource is no more active in TMW (content, client and server) development and that there is no common platform, I think it would be better for both projects if they had separated forums: It would avoid to TMW players to be confused with activities in both projects (The Questlog... but how? for example) and avoid manasource developers to have to seek among dizains of posts to retrieve useful information. Information about other projects like "source of tales" can be posted in Player talk as information about other servers are. The last, but not the least: It would make the description of TMW project a lot easier in a "marketing" point of view.o11c wrote:Recent discussions have made it quite clear that the people working on Mana - currently our official client - do not care at all about support for the tmwa server. [...]
Well we simply only search in the one forum. So I do not see any issue here.Nard wrote: and avoid manasource developers to have to seek among dizains of posts to retrieve useful information
But other people can see. "View new posts" will be spammed with unrelated things.Ablu wrote:Well we simply only search in the one forum. So I do not see any issue here.Nard wrote: and avoid manasource developers to have to seek among dizains of posts to retrieve useful information