The Mana World Forums

[quote="Melkior]I am too old to be fighting windmills, and too tired to throw myself into a revolution
[...]
This gets to you after a while. I'm very passionate about things I like[/quote]
erm... being passionate is rather a nice quality It does not imply that you're infallible, but who makes no error?
Maybe under the actual circumstances, this poll would give Melkior's opinion a different weight. I am personally sure that I do not agree with all his decisions, What I am also sure about is that he is deeply honest... and I am a fan of Don Quixote.
Now I can vote for you, I missed the preceding one.

Nota bene: Sockpuppeteers not welcome even with a proxy.
I checked "Allow re-voting" and specified 0 days, but I disagree with those rules.

We all know that Melkior has proven to be a good Gm.

So I vote yes again.

Hoping you'll accept again

Would vote yes because he already shoved himself as capable of doing stuff GM.

*Evil*

Well, he clearly doesn't want the job, so another poll is rather useless. But if it helps to show him that he isn't as unwanted as he may think he is...

Voted yes

i will vote yes, because melkior its a good gm .

Well, I can't vote because of the 20 post thing, but I would've voted yes. Maybe he doesn't want to be a GM, but I can surely show that I liked his role in that post.


*grumbles* Got to spam some threads to get the right to vote *grumbles*

I also can't vote in the poll but I offer my +1 on this matter. Melkior seems like a good dude and has been a successful GM in the past.

.:WildX:. wrote:Well, he clearly doesn't want the job, so another poll is rather useless. But if it helps to show him that he isn't as unwanted as he may think he is...

If the poll is not sockpuppetted by @&# cheaters

Really whatever for me... but voted yes

On the off chance this actually goes through (which is highly doubtful, but better to err on the side of caution), I respectfully request this topic be locked as I have no intention of being a part of TMWC again.

As there is a candidate actually interested in the position, your time will be much better spent in this thread.

melkior wrote:On the off chance this actually goes through (which is highly doubtful, but better to err on the side of caution),.

If you're interested to see if it has a chance, then don't ask to lock it Now you're dismiss and the reasons why you did it makes you in my opinion, the best possible candidates.

Antoine Houdar de La Motte wrote:C'est un grand agrément que la diversité :
Nous sommes bien comme nous sommes.
Donnez le même esprit aux hommes,
Vous ôtez tout le sel de la société.
L'ennui naquit un jour de l'uniformité.

(original is a poem)
What a great thing is diversity:
we are good as we are.
Give the same mind to people,
you remove all the salt from society
boredom was born some day from uniformity

edit: I hope some changes could result from it. If not I seriously doubt that TMW has any future.

I voted no. His behavior was increasingly hostile in general, towards the committee and towards individuals within it. What changes were made were never satisfactory and his opinion of other leaders is very low. If he didn't step down soon, I would've requested he be removed.

To Nard, people need to be able to work with TMWC to be on it. Constant drama, strife and divisiveness is not why people volunteer large portions of their life to making this game happen. Those that can't get along with TMWC aren't wrong, but at a certain point if they can't work with others, they need to move on.

Why are you even voting on a poll that I requested be locked? Or do I not have the same rights as other candidates who aren't interested in the position and cannot request locking the topic?

melkior wrote:Why are you even voting on a poll that I requested be locked? Or do I not have the same rights as other candidates who aren't interested in the position and cannot request locking the topic?

Hello melkior.

Sorry for missing your post. I will lock this thread now.