Page 1 of 2

player levels in the forums...

Posted: 15 Jul 2009, 17:03
by DonCBen
This is my 44th post and I'm still "peon." How many does it take to be Novice??

Re: player levels in the forums...

Posted: 15 Jul 2009, 19:55
by Habari
100 posts if im not wrong !!!

but please do NOT spam the forums in order to get a higher rank quickly.

Re: player levels in the forums...

Posted: 16 Jul 2009, 13:54
by DonCBen
Oh, don't worry about spamming from me. I am not one to do something like that, I was just curious because I'm tired of seeing "peon" when I've been doing this for 4 or 5 months now :)

Thanks for the answer tho! Maybe I need to get involved in some more conversations!! At this rate, I'll have been here for a year before I make 2nd rank. :shock:

By the way, that avatar rocks!! I feel the same way :)

Re: player levels in the forums...

Posted: 16 Jul 2009, 16:08
by Platyna
It is made for purpose. And this purpose is to prevent people from post whoring, to advance their ranks.

Regards.

Re: player levels in the forums...

Posted: 19 Jul 2009, 06:16
by Pixiebobs
Post Whoring ? :lol:

Re: player levels in the forums...

Posted: 21 Jul 2009, 08:53
by Dark Lord
DonCBen wrote:Oh, don't worry about spamming from me. I am not one to do something like that, I was just curious because I'm tired of seeing "peon" when I've been doing this for 4 or 5 months now :)

Thanks for the answer tho! Maybe I need to get involved in some more conversations!! At this rate, I'll have been here for a year before I make 2nd rank. :shock:

By the way, that avatar rocks!! I feel the same way :)

About the avatar, i totally disagree LOL

Re: player levels in the forums...

Posted: 21 Jul 2009, 12:40
by DonCBen
I am starting to feel anti microsoft, and with IE being in that category, I now go with FireFox. I also want to move completely to linux systems, but haven't made it there yet. Everyone is entitled to their opinion, of course :D
IMHO, microsoft is the main reason most computers have such viral issues, there are too many holes for malicious software/people. Of course, I know it's also a popularity thing. So many people attack windows, b/c that's what everyone has.

I wonder if this is about to turn into another topic completely... :mrgreen:

Re: player levels in the forums...

Posted: 22 Jul 2009, 06:33
by Dark Lord
DonCBen wrote:I am starting to feel anti microsoft, and with IE being in that category, I now go with FireFox. I also want to move completely to linux systems, but haven't made it there yet. Everyone is entitled to their opinion, of course :D
IMHO, microsoft is the main reason most computers have such viral issues, there are too many holes for malicious software/people. Of course, I know it's also a popularity thing. So many people attack windows, b/c that's what everyone has.

I wonder if this is about to turn into another topic completely... :mrgreen:
Actually, Microsoft can't be that bad, the U.S.A. army, the Australian army, etc all use Windows XP to run their systems and hardly any software works on linux, especially games most are for Windows and sometimes for mac and windows but they're all mostly for windows. :p

Re: player levels in the forums...

Posted: 22 Jul 2009, 06:35
by Jaxad0127
Dark Lord wrote:
DonCBen wrote:I am starting to feel anti microsoft, and with IE being in that category, I now go with FireFox. I also want to move completely to linux systems, but haven't made it there yet. Everyone is entitled to their opinion, of course :D
IMHO, microsoft is the main reason most computers have such viral issues, there are too many holes for malicious software/people. Of course, I know it's also a popularity thing. So many people attack windows, b/c that's what everyone has.

I wonder if this is about to turn into another topic completely... :mrgreen:
Actually, Microsoft can't be that bad, the U.S.A. army, the Australian army, etc all use Windows XP to run their systems.
The US military is using Linux more and more. And it was a fault in XP that caused the British and French submarines to collide.

Re: player levels in the forums...

Posted: 22 Jul 2009, 06:38
by Dark Lord
jaxad0127 wrote:
Dark Lord wrote:
DonCBen wrote:I am starting to feel anti microsoft, and with IE being in that category, I now go with FireFox. I also want to move completely to linux systems, but haven't made it there yet. Everyone is entitled to their opinion, of course :D
IMHO, microsoft is the main reason most computers have such viral issues, there are too many holes for malicious software/people. Of course, I know it's also a popularity thing. So many people attack windows, b/c that's what everyone has.

I wonder if this is about to turn into another topic completely... :mrgreen:
Actually, Microsoft can't be that bad, the U.S.A. army, the Australian army, etc all use Windows XP to run their systems.
The US military is using Linux more and more. And it was a fault in XP that caused the British and French submarines to collide.
Well there could be a fault in any operating system, and what military would be dumb enough to switch to linux when its just put together by a bunch of developers, its not actually a solid operating system.

Re: player levels in the forums...

Posted: 22 Jul 2009, 07:05
by .:age:.
Dark Lord wrote: Well there could be a fault in any operating system, and what military would be dumb enough to switch to linux when its just put together by a bunch of developers, its not actually a solid operating system.
That, actually depends on the distro. Redhat, for example is quite droolfully solid. Ubuntu is also fairly solid, for a Linux sell-out.

Re: player levels in the forums...

Posted: 22 Jul 2009, 15:12
by Jaxad0127
Dark Lord wrote:Well there could be a fault in any operating system, and what military would be dumb enough to switch to linux when its just put together by a bunch of developers, its not actually a solid operating system.
And the difference is? Linux us far more solid than Windows. It's used more in high performance, high availability, embedded, etc, systems than Windows.

Re: player levels in the forums...

Posted: 22 Jul 2009, 19:29
by DonCBen
When's the last time someone hacked/coded a virus for a Linux system that lasted more than a couple days, if even that long? How about for Windows? Yesterday? Right now? I worked at a place that used windows one time, and it got hit so bad that we didn't get to do any work for 4 whole days. Also, I was in the US military, and the reason windows is working (decently) is that the whole system if firewalled so badly, that you can't even go to websites that are completely relevant most of the time without filling out paperwork and cutting "red-tape" for a month. And even then, a lot of programs are DOS based still, making them a little safer.

And as far as "any OS can have a problem" (referring to the sub marine crash): That's a profoundly large problem! It's not like it lost somebody's phone number, 2 submarines didn't know where each other were located and crashed. Once again, not a small issue.

Donnie B.

Re: player levels in the forums...

Posted: 23 Jul 2009, 16:01
by theboomboomcars
Dark Lord wrote:Well there could be a fault in any operating system, and what military would be dumb enough to switch to linux when its just put together by a bunch of developers, its not actually a solid operating system.
Isn't every operating system put together by a bunch of developers. I wouldn't want to use one put together by a bunch of slugs personally.

You should let google, amazon, the NY stock exchange, the London Stock exchange, and the 60% of the internet servers using Linux that it isn't solid enough and they should switch to something more stable. Since the London Stock exchange just switched to linux because of the problems they were having with Windows, I don't think they will believe you if you told them otherwise.

Re: player levels in the forums...

Posted: 24 Jul 2009, 07:28
by Rotonen
The London Stock Exchange did not have problems with Windows, they had problems with the solution they had bought, which just happened to be build on top of Windows (which in this case worked rather properly). The competing solution they bought just happens to run on Linux. Learn to read your articles.

In military usage the OS does not really matter that much since all critical data is isolated from remote access (usually physically) and in embedded solutions you don't usually have an OS between the hardware and the software anyway.

Instead of concentrating on OS wars, compare solutions.