Page 1 of 2

Court house is not effective (and needs to be removed)

Posted: 17 Jul 2009, 18:39
by Len
Just for the record, I saw Len a couple times this week, playing on different characters. Never met him before that in a year and a half of tmw. I noticed that he was trying to initiate conflict with any of the character he used. We just got another example. If this is a joke, this is one of really bad taste.

I call into question the legitimacy of the Court House, Someone like me can easily manipulate images to make it appear as if anyone is saying anything. (any pixel artist can) so as I am sunsun regardless of if I'm tell the truth or not. sugar should be freed and no screenshot can be used as evidence (which means the Court House needs to be reworked) i should also be banned

Re: Court house is not effective (and needs to be removed)

Posted: 17 Jul 2009, 19:07
by SunSun
Is this a relevant post to the already decided situation?

This is not the place for Discussion or for jokes.

Topic is being locked.
:lol: Free her now, remove the Court House (I have proven it infective)

and ban me

Re: Court house is not effective (and needs to be removed)

Posted: 17 Jul 2009, 19:42
by MasterKenobi
Len wrote:
Just for the record, I saw Len a couple times this week, playing on different characters. Never met him before that in a year and a half of tmw. I noticed that he was trying to initiate conflict with any of the character he used. We just got another example. If this is a joke, this is one of really bad taste.

I call into question the legitimacy of the Court House, Someone like me can easily manipulate images to make it appear as if anyone is saying anything. (any pixel artist can) so as I am sunsun regardless of if I'm tell the truth or not. sugar should be freed and no screenshot can be used as evidence (which means the Court House needs to be reworked) i should also be banned
MasterKenobi GM:
The courthouse does not consider screen shots as evidence. Though we may question someone about the contents of a screenshot, we do not consider the contents of said screen shot as proof of anything.

MasterKenobi Player:
It is my opinion, for reasons unknown you are trying to stir up controversy. You will no doubt succeed in the short term. People who gravitate to controversy, confrontation, and enjoy reading their own comments will find this to their liking. In the long term you do nothing but damage your own credibility as others have similarly done in the past. It is my hopes you will reconsider.

MK

Re: Court house is not effective (and needs to be removed)

Posted: 17 Jul 2009, 19:49
by kr0n05931
MasterKenobi wrote: It is my opinion, for reasons unknown you are trying to stir up controversy. You will no doubt succeed in the short term. People who gravitate to controversy, confrontation, and enjoy reading their own comments will find this to their liking. In the long term you do nothing but damage your own credibility as others have similarly done in the past. It is my hopes you will reconsider.

MK
The interesting thing is that Len's simple act has resulted in total anarchy.

Do I smell a TMW civil war between the GMs and the players? :wink:

Re: Court house is not effective (and needs to be removed)

Posted: 17 Jul 2009, 19:57
by MasterKenobi
kr0n05931 wrote:
Do I smell a TMW civil war between the GMs and the players? :wink:
:shock:

I hope not, we(GM's) wouldn't stand a chance :wink:

MK

Re: Court house is not effective (and needs to be removed)

Posted: 17 Jul 2009, 20:16
by Len
kr0n05931 wrote:
MasterKenobi wrote: It is my opinion, for reasons unknown you are trying to stir up controversy. You will no doubt succeed in the short term. People who gravitate to controversy, confrontation, and enjoy reading their own comments will find this to their liking. In the long term you do nothing but damage your own credibility as others have similarly done in the past. It is my hopes you will reconsider.

MK
The interesting thing is that Len's simple act has resulted in total anarchy.
:roll: Do you think I'm the first to twist reality in such a way!
and the GMs have no credibility the GM hat that was floating about is proof of that

Re: Court house is not effective (and needs to be removed)

Posted: 17 Jul 2009, 20:22
by Matt
I will just talk like i would to my beloved Modanung or irukard:

Len, quit the Chocolate Cupcake and start pixeling!

Thank you :)

Re: Court house is not effective (and needs to be removed)

Posted: 17 Jul 2009, 20:25
by Len
Matt wrote:I will just talk like i would to my beloved Modanung or irukard:

Len, quit the **** and start pixeling!

Thank you :)
:lol: OK Its time to stop making trouble (No one here see the problem, I'll let them find out on their own)

Re: Court house is not effective (and needs to be removed)

Posted: 17 Jul 2009, 20:27
by Matt
Len wrote:
Matt wrote:I will just talk like i would to my beloved Modanung or irukard:

Len, quit the **** and start pixeling!

Thank you :)
:lol: OK Its time to stop making trouble (No one here see the problem, I'll let them find out on their own)
You pixel, I make problems. Lets call it a deal :)

Re: Court house is not effective (and needs to be removed)

Posted: 17 Jul 2009, 20:28
by MasterKenobi
Len wrote:
kr0n05931 wrote:
MasterKenobi wrote: It is my opinion, for reasons unknown you are trying to stir up controversy. You will no doubt succeed in the short term. People who gravitate to controversy, confrontation, and enjoy reading their own comments will find this to their liking. In the long term you do nothing but damage your own credibility as others have similarly done in the past. It is my hopes you will reconsider.

MK
The interesting thing is that Len's simple act has resulted in total anarchy.
:roll: Do you think I'm the first to twist reality in such a way!
and the GMs have no credibility the GM hat that was floating about is proof of that
Len: It takes more than a hat too make a GM. The hat is just a symbol for recognition purposes as you well know. It has no reflection on our credibility.

kr0n: He deliberately targeted one the most well known players(and easy targets) then made the actions public to evoke this type of response. Simple? Yes, in terms of thinking, but also predictable, this isn't the first time someone has tried this type of thing and won't be the last.

MK

Re: Court house is not effective (and needs to be removed)

Posted: 17 Jul 2009, 20:31
by Len
Len: It takes more than a hat too make a GM. The hat is just a symbol for recognition purposes as you well know. It has no reflection on our credibility.


MK
how did he/she get his/her dirty hands on the hat (if it was a bug or hack there would be thousands of them)
kr0n: He deliberately targeted one the most well known players(and easy targets) then made the actions public to evoke this type of response. Simple? Yes, in terms of thinking, but also predictable, this isn't the first time someone has tried this type of thing and won't be the last.
If I hadn't said anything no one but sugar and me would have known

Re: Court house is not effective (and needs to be removed)

Posted: 17 Jul 2009, 20:46
by Matt
@Len: I guess the person who you are talking about (whoever that is) made the hat.

Re: Court house is not effective (and needs to be removed)

Posted: 17 Jul 2009, 20:50
by Len
Matt wrote: deal :)
Deal (Platyna be praised)
she was impartial, uncaring, she would have happily banned me for this ****
the perfect GM

Re: Court house is not effective (and needs to be removed)

Posted: 17 Jul 2009, 20:51
by Wombat
Delasia called me a gross pig!

Now all I have to do is swear up and down that this happened and get someone banned.

Re: Court house is not effective (and needs to be removed)

Posted: 17 Jul 2009, 20:59
by MasterKenobi
Len wrote:
how did he/she get his/her dirty hands on the hat (if it was a bug or hack there would be thousands of them)
That's a good question. Since GM's cannot create items, perhaps this question could be best answered by......oh I don't know......... a DEVELOPER! Since only a select few can create items, it should be a short list of possibilities. Or maybe you could ask slicer, he may know? Also, did anyone actually see the hat in question? Hmm, a lot of questions...........
Len wrote: If I hadn't said anything no one but sugar and me would have known
That's very true. By your own admission you are SunSun, and SunSun was the one who reported this in the courthouse. Therefore, by your own admission you made this public and in turn started this confrontation.

If your intentions are as you say: "to prove the courthouse as ineffective" you have undoubtedly failed. It is my contention that the courthouse is not meant to deal with this type of complaint. This is being discussed by the GM's currently and will be worked out in time.
If your intentions are as you say: to "call in to question the legitimacy of the courthouse" you done no such thing. The courthouse is a place to post legitimate complaints and infractions of the game rules. You have not changed that in any way.
If your intentions are as you say: to "prove the GM's have no credibility" I'm sorry you have failed yet again.

MK