ideas for Big displays

Content and general development discussion, including maps, quests, and server code from the development team.
User avatar
Modanung
Knight
Knight
Posts: 1719
Joined: 20 May 2005, 16:51
Location: Groningen, The Netherlands
Contact:

Post by Modanung » 29 Sep 2005, 22:37

No, maze puzzles/maps would be easier, still giving high-res players advanatages.
If you're looking for 3D FOSS games be sure to check out LucKey Productions on itch.io
User avatar
Talaroc
Novice
Novice
Posts: 429
Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 05:23
Location: The Frozen North
Contact:

Post by Talaroc » 30 Sep 2005, 05:59

Is there a reason that, for smaller displays, everything can't be scaled down, so that they see the same number of tiles, just at a smaller scale?
User avatar
Tenche
Novice
Novice
Posts: 421
Joined: 14 Jun 2005, 21:21
Location: Reston
Contact:

Post by Tenche » 30 Sep 2005, 11:06

ya

Admin move this topic to General Development section
User avatar
Bjørn
TMW Adviser
TMW Adviser
Posts: 1430
Joined: 09 Dec 2004, 19:50
Location: North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Contact:

Post by Bjørn » 30 Sep 2005, 20:18

Talaroc wrote:Is there a reason that, for smaller displays, everything can't be scaled down, so that they see the same number of tiles, just at a smaller scale?
This simply poses the same technical problems as scaling everything up for higher resolution displays. If we solve either we have probably solved both.
User avatar
Crush
TMW Adviser
TMW Adviser
Posts: 8046
Joined: 25 Aug 2005, 17:08
Location: Germany

Post by Crush » 30 Sep 2005, 21:20

i doubt that the tiles and sprites would still look good when automatically rescaled.

here a screenshot scaled 1:1. thats how it would look at 800x600.
Image

here rescaled to fill the same area at 1024x768
Image

here for 640x480
Image

i used bicubic interpolation. this might be too slow to use it on the fly. that means we will only have such a good quality when we precalculate the tilesets for every possible resolution. when we rescale everything at runtime the graphical quality will be even worse.
xand
Peon
Peon
Posts: 95
Joined: 19 Jul 2005, 19:08

Post by xand » 01 Oct 2005, 01:24

Isn't a higher resolution mostly to see more ?

At least I remember that all those top down games I played
just increased the view-size. I was always happy too see more.

And btw: Thats one of the big reasons to play a game windowed.
Scaled to 1600x1024 tmw would look strange imo... :D
User avatar
maci
Warrior
Warrior
Posts: 507
Joined: 05 Dec 2004, 21:01
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by maci » 01 Oct 2005, 07:13

jup

it was not about scaling the tiles it was about seeing more tiles at the same time
ElvenProgrammer wrote:Maci: don't be rude, we're here to help people ;)
User avatar
Rotonen
TMW Adviser
TMW Adviser
Posts: 3154
Joined: 08 Sep 2004, 20:48
Location: Espoo, Finland

Post by Rotonen » 01 Oct 2005, 13:44

Since we're open source, I think we cannot prevent people from increasing the map viewsize, but I also think our default client should have the same area visible for every resolution. And since we're open soruce it's not that hard to do pre-scaled tiles for different resolutions if people want them (they could have custom repositories).
This message used to be meaningful.
Matt
Knight
Knight
Posts: 1747
Joined: 07 Aug 2004, 11:47
Location: Germany->Bavaria

Post by Matt » 01 Oct 2005, 15:02

Well it wouldn't matter. If the server sends only the informations about a area that is always the same people can modifiy the client, but they only would see the map. no monsters, players, items, npcs, balblalbalbaa
User avatar
ktm
Novice
Novice
Posts: 201
Joined: 14 Jul 2005, 10:24
Location: Vokietija

Post by ktm » 01 Oct 2005, 22:55

if any resizing takes place, i'd say to go with even numbers for scaling. that way we could use scaling methods suitable for "snes-style"/"comic" content (Imagehq2x, hq3x etc) so the resulting images wouldn't look too crappy (some even say snes games scaled via this method look better than the originals). bilinear/bicubic etc are okay for natural images, but crap for pixel art.

samples:
Image2x scaled
Image3x scaled - this one actually looks quite good ^_^
Image4x scaled

on second thought: unfortunately that'd limit the valid sizes to 800x600, 1600x1200, 2400x1800 etc, which could be a little too high for some people... unless we cut something off at the borders, giving them a disadvantage...
User avatar
Crush
TMW Adviser
TMW Adviser
Posts: 8046
Joined: 25 Aug 2005, 17:08
Location: Germany

Post by Crush » 01 Oct 2005, 23:32

that method really looks good. does gimp support this algorithm?
User avatar
ktm
Novice
Novice
Posts: 201
Joined: 14 Jul 2005, 10:24
Location: Vokietija

Post by ktm » 02 Oct 2005, 00:30

dunno - doubt it though, since the size multiplier's fixed, so it wouldnt work too well as a plugin. but you can use the standalone versions instead.
Post Reply