Ok, you have gained my trust when it comes to capacity to produce. (As in the full pipeline of composing/rendering/mastering.)
From here on you have immunity from my nitpicking (does not tell you it will not happen, tells you that you can ignore it until you feel like finishing the piece into perfection) and instead of twiddling with details and finishing stuff to the finest details, you can go into mass production.
For the mass production you should come into contact with dave, since he is the most familiar with our world at the moment. As stated on the forums many times over I'd like to have regional themes, arranged transitions between those and a theme of the world arranged from all the main regional themes.
At the moment doing random is good since it's improving the quality and enjoyability of our project, but on the long term it's just first aid.
Also for referrence and the sake of archiving, please use some sort of a versioning/revision controlling on the files you share with us. Just come up with a sensible standard.
I'll propose for something like "nameofcomposer-designphase-songname-revision.ogg". You are free to disagree.
For example this could on the long run mean some poor fellow's song could go through 7 revisions of composing before we are happy, then go into 4 iterations of how to render it and finally be tortured in the merry go round of mixing for 50 revisions. For the sake of tracking what is happening and why (and especially to reduce the numbers of revisions per design phase), the revision control archiving is good. Also gives new people joining in on the fun some interesting insight. Also brings drafts into commentary faster. Cannot see any negative sides to it.
This message used to be meaningful.