[GM Review] Re: [BAN] MItsu

A place for The Mana World players to discuss game-related topics outside the scope of development including guilds, player interactions, game meta and more.


User avatar
Wombat
TMW Adviser
TMW Adviser
Posts: 1532
Joined: 08 Aug 2008, 16:31

[GM Review] Re: [BAN] MItsu

Post by Wombat »

GM Review Re: [BAN] MItsu
rodrigo14 wrote:
Ðamis™ wrote:There is none, and this is not a discussion forum. Remember that.

~Damis
I think ban for botting GM need post screenshot I'm wrong?
It is not a necessity for GMs to report screenshots, but without screenshots many players feel uncomfortable with a GM's decision, as in this case. I prefer to see screenshots for bans as well.
Current character is "Abolish".
User avatar
Goku
Knight
Knight
Posts: 925
Joined: 15 Feb 2009, 00:57

Re: [GM Review] Re: [BAN] MItsu

Post by Goku »

Skull_Master's ban also had no screenshot.
IGN - Trunks
Pixel Artist In Training
Work On Forest Armor
And Forest Monster
Armadeus
Knight
Knight
Posts: 558
Joined: 14 Mar 2009, 15:16
Location: Canada

Re: [GM Review] Re: [BAN] MItsu

Post by Armadeus »

You should be able to trust an administrator/Game master/any other type of staff.

@Goku Check the "Signature Fix-Up" Topic.
User avatar
Wombat
TMW Adviser
TMW Adviser
Posts: 1532
Joined: 08 Aug 2008, 16:31

Re: [GM Review] Re: [BAN] MItsu

Post by Wombat »

I prefer to remain skeptical Damis. GMs have earned trust to gain their position, but that doesn't mean they stopped being human. This isn't an attempt at hostility with the GMs or to create a lack of "trust". This is a review of a ban without a screenshot where players can give opinions and perhaps our feedback can help the GMs. I don't think anyone has been maliciously banned from the game, if that means anything to you.

Also, because we (players) can't comment in the Court House, these types of threads are welcome here so players can discuss anything in the Court House without interference.
Current character is "Abolish".
Armadeus
Knight
Knight
Posts: 558
Joined: 14 Mar 2009, 15:16
Location: Canada

Re: [GM Review] Re: [BAN] MItsu

Post by Armadeus »

Katze wrote:We don't need to provide screenshots. They are just a nice extra - nothing more. They don't prove anything
As Katze said, the GM's shouldn't have to provide screenshots, they should be well trusted.
User avatar
Wombat
TMW Adviser
TMW Adviser
Posts: 1532
Joined: 08 Aug 2008, 16:31

Re: [GM Review] Re: [BAN] MItsu

Post by Wombat »

Damis, unlike you, I am not an unthinking automaton. I'm done with you.
Current character is "Abolish".
Armadeus
Knight
Knight
Posts: 558
Joined: 14 Mar 2009, 15:16
Location: Canada

Re: [GM Review] Re: [BAN] MItsu

Post by Armadeus »

Alright, be gone. :roll:
User avatar
Jaxad0127
Manasource
Manasource
Posts: 4209
Joined: 01 Nov 2007, 17:35
Location: Internet

Re: [GM Review] Re: [BAN] MItsu

Post by Jaxad0127 »

Screenshots can be faked anyways.
Image
User avatar
Wombat
TMW Adviser
TMW Adviser
Posts: 1532
Joined: 08 Aug 2008, 16:31

Re: [GM Review] Re: [BAN] MItsu

Post by Wombat »

For the GM's own bot reports? :shock: That would be both sad and interesting. I still prefer the potential of a big fix over no picture. A player banned with a fixed picture would probably throw a stink.
Current character is "Abolish".
User avatar
Katze
Knight
Knight
Posts: 866
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 16:03
Location: Germany

Re: [GM Review] Re: [BAN] MItsu

Post by Katze »

I also prefere to be able to provide screenshots.
Yet, there are cases in which I can't do that out of stupid reasons like a different keyboard for example. :P

Skull_Master and Mitsu were standing at the same spot botting and they are one person. That meant they came into the same situation of me not being familiar with a keyboard.

Next time I'll know where the key is. :P
Meow! (Katze is also known as Plush & Kater)
User avatar
Wombat
TMW Adviser
TMW Adviser
Posts: 1532
Joined: 08 Aug 2008, 16:31

Re: [GM Review] Re: [BAN] MItsu

Post by Wombat »

Thank you Katze :D
Current character is "Abolish".
User avatar
Jumpy
Knight
Knight
Posts: 611
Joined: 25 Jan 2009, 23:31
Location: Somewhere on Earth between an Ocean and a Blue Sea

Re: [GM Review] Re: [BAN] MItsu

Post by Jumpy »

it seems to me that, since the special isolation room is used (as MK nearly always do it), they cannot be any way to discuss a ban for botting no ?

and what if you say to people that when you get afk you just have to sit by the side instead of being still on the spot ?

Regards
DBMP - BMS - HFDI
Don't Bring Me Problems - Bring Me Solution
and Have Fun Doing It : P

lvl 99 89 56 51 47 42 7
User avatar
Katze
Knight
Knight
Posts: 866
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 16:03
Location: Germany

Re: [GM Review] Re: [BAN] MItsu

Post by Katze »

We spawn monsters on the botcheck map and often also elsewhere. So we see if someone is just standing there or actually botting. I don't see the need to tell people to sit down when they're away for that reason.

And people can always prevent being banned by reacting in any way within the set time limit. No matter where they are.
Meow! (Katze is also known as Plush & Kater)
User avatar
Goku
Knight
Knight
Posts: 925
Joined: 15 Feb 2009, 00:57

Re: [GM Review] Re: [BAN] MItsu

Post by Goku »

So you wouldn't get banned for just standing in a pile of people botting? Or attacking normally?
IGN - Trunks
Pixel Artist In Training
Work On Forest Armor
And Forest Monster
User avatar
Jumpy
Knight
Knight
Posts: 611
Joined: 25 Jan 2009, 23:31
Location: Somewhere on Earth between an Ocean and a Blue Sea

Re: [GM Review] Re: [BAN] MItsu

Post by Jumpy »

and what if you are not interested in the drops ? :) joke

i know perfectley honest people not botting that don't take any of the dropped items... and just take the xp

if you don't show up they won't moove
DBMP - BMS - HFDI
Don't Bring Me Problems - Bring Me Solution
and Have Fun Doing It : P

lvl 99 89 56 51 47 42 7
Post Reply