Stuff from Aethyra up for review

[UzZBeatzZ]

I have here a chest-valentine-dress.Nice or not? - I have here a picture .Check it out .

Picture:



Nice or Good?

[UzZBeatzZ]

Here i have a monster what sweet is .His name is Blurbie.Check it out guys.

Blurbie:

[UzZBeatzZ]

Here i have a new monster.That is absoult not sweet .Check it out.

Snowflake:

[Rotonen]

Aethyra, if I recall correctly.

Also, if someone fixes it and the license is compatible: why not.

[UzZBeatzZ]

I have my arts.Look on Graphics development >> ClownMask.

[Enchilado!]

I'm guessing this is from Aethyra too...

~nice monster, but I wouldn't touch one from Aethyra.
Enchilado

[UzZBeatzZ]

Yeah, but not from TMW.That is a new monster for TMW .

[octalot]

It's under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0, according to Aethyra's license file.

[Jetryl]

There's a standard way to shade spheres; they have one specular highlight, and everything gets darker further away from that. (this assumes any light coming from the viewer's side of the picture, which is basically always true for videogames).

This is an example of how to do it right; the Nu is basically a sphere:



Please fix this. Not caring about the difference makes games like this suck.

[Rotonen]

Non-commercial forbids us from using it. (GPL allows commercial usage.)

[adamaix]

I never thought of license compatibility like that, thanks I learned something today.

[Rotonen]

At least back in the days while talking with Frictor, we had a common understanding that it could be made possible for us to nap that dress from them.

[Black Don]

I don't like the dress cause there is no movement in it. You might as well be walking in a dress made of stone. There needs to be some sway when walking or else it looks awful.

[Rotonen]

Also, if someone fixes it and the license is compatible: why not.