Dyna, Dimond and (~_~#) got banned
Re: Dyna, Dimond and (~_~#) got banned
ah so now we have to we have to do screen shots every time we speek cause a GM may or may not be present and ban us for it? GMs have the power to ban we do not thus the onus of proof is on them to show what we did wrong.jaxad0127 wrote:You demand proof from GMs. Why not provide it yourself?Dyna wrote:No Jax I dont have a screenie of her abusing me because I never thought I would have to take one!
Tell you what...from now on I will screenie anything she ever says around me...because the word of player means nothing unless we have a screenie and the GM log tells all for a GM...
Re: Dyna, Dimond and (~_~#) got banned
Thank you for admitting to abusing GMs..Dyna wrote:Delasia you are right...I did say about how we dont have to follow what you say...why? Because you are game masters...not rule MAKERS!
The rules are simple and easy...
1. Do not abuse other players (it means insults, swearing etc. directed to a particular person/s)
2. No bots (and by botting I mean ANY AFK activity in game).
3. No spamming/flooding (including trade spam).
4. No begging.
5. Speak English on public chat.
6. RFC 1855.
Tell me how...in the time we were there...did we break any of these? You cant...because we didnt...get off your high horse and get down in the dirt with us players...
We publicly bash the GMs because you deserve it...you havent earned our respect...just buying it with paper bags and pretty words
Last i checked we are all players and people so. Rule #1 broken, hence BAN
.."if all you keep in your toolbox is a hammer, then the only way YOU can fix things is pound it"..
Re: Dyna, Dimond and (~_~#) got banned

Its simply us stating our dissatisfaction of your job...you are sucking as a GM and as a player we have the right to voice our opinion...if thats abuse then you better be ready to ban a LOT more people
Wishing things were different...hoping for better now.
[2009-08-15 02:48:59] 009-1.gat(53,34) doorsman : @ban 1d Dimond
[2009-08-15 02:49:08] 009-1.gat(53,34) doorsman : @ban 1d Dyna
[2009-08-15 02:49:50] 009-1.gat(53,34) doorsman : @ban 1d (~_~#)
Re: Dyna, Dimond and (~_~#) got banned
Re: Dyna, Dimond and (~_~#) got banned
lmao i've never been around when Platyna was GM? get real Doors please stop speaking stupidly. You and Delasia are the worst GM's there could be for a game, i've played many games and you guys are a disgrace to GM's.doorsman wrote:Indeed.. Platyna would've ban without warning or posting... That was her area. If you aren't sure ask players who lived under her area before posting about her..Booth wrote:We have no respect for the new GM's so why would we actually try to follow what they say they abuse thier power, Platyna never did this.
"I believe that sex is a beautiful thing between two people. Between five, it's fantastic."
Re: Dyna, Dimond and (~_~#) got banned
Thank you Platyna, these guys are abusing thier powers and it needs to be stopped.Platyna wrote:Erm, and since "mocking" and not doing what GM asked is bannable offence?doorsman wrote:Those 3 players got banned for mocking and not do what a gm asked. The bans are for 24 hours.
It seems quite crazy to ban old and respected members of the community, including one who was making content for the game...
Regards.
"I believe that sex is a beautiful thing between two people. Between five, it's fantastic."
Re: Dyna, Dimond and (~_~#) got banned
I stand by all that is said in this file. the closest thing to abuse I said was when I referred to any GM that would use threats and insults as a Troll GM.adamaix wrote:http://tmw.pastebin.com/f403e1aef
Re: Dyna, Dimond and (~_~#) got banned
Rule #1 wasn't broken they didnt say a particular person till you started threatening to ban, they used GM's as a whole.Delasia wrote:Thank you for admitting to abusing GMs..Dyna wrote:Delasia you are right...I did say about how we dont have to follow what you say...why? Because you are game masters...not rule MAKERS!
The rules are simple and easy...
1. Do not abuse other players (it means insults, swearing etc. directed to a particular person/s)
2. No bots (and by botting I mean ANY AFK activity in game).
3. No spamming/flooding (including trade spam).
4. No begging.
5. Speak English on public chat.
6. RFC 1855.
Tell me how...in the time we were there...did we break any of these? You cant...because we didnt...get off your high horse and get down in the dirt with us players...
We publicly bash the GMs because you deserve it...you havent earned our respect...just buying it with paper bags and pretty words
Last i checked we are all players and people so. Rule #1 broken, hence BAN
"I believe that sex is a beautiful thing between two people. Between five, it's fantastic."
Re: Dyna, Dimond and (~_~#) got banned
Dy
Wishing things were different...hoping for better now.
[2009-08-15 02:48:59] 009-1.gat(53,34) doorsman : @ban 1d Dimond
[2009-08-15 02:49:08] 009-1.gat(53,34) doorsman : @ban 1d Dyna
[2009-08-15 02:49:50] 009-1.gat(53,34) doorsman : @ban 1d (~_~#)
Re: Dyna, Dimond and (~_~#) got banned
Re: Dyna, Dimond and (~_~#) got banned
If you're wondering why I'm doing this, Bjørn is on vacation right now and I was given temporary adminship of the server.
Re: Dyna, Dimond and (~_~#) got banned
Just remember that this is NOT a fix...this should not have happened in the first place.
What is going to be done about Doors and Delasia? What punishments do they receive?
There are a lot of us who say take the cap and the powers away...they clearly over stepped their bounds over and over and we are tired of it.
Dy
Wishing things were different...hoping for better now.
[2009-08-15 02:48:59] 009-1.gat(53,34) doorsman : @ban 1d Dimond
[2009-08-15 02:49:08] 009-1.gat(53,34) doorsman : @ban 1d Dyna
[2009-08-15 02:49:50] 009-1.gat(53,34) doorsman : @ban 1d (~_~#)
Re: Dyna, Dimond and (~_~#) got banned
"I believe that sex is a beautiful thing between two people. Between five, it's fantastic."
Re: Dyna, Dimond and (~_~#) got banned
Regards
-Getafix