New Tophat with xml [FND]

All development of pixel art and graphics
Post Reply
User avatar
meway
Knight
Knight
Posts: 1736
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 6:02 am
Location: Detroit MI
Contact:

New Tophat with xml [FND]

Post by meway » Tue Jun 22, 2010 8:55 pm

http://meway.webs.com/head-tophat.zip
you may find xml in this zip with icons and sprite.
here is a preview.
I would not replace the original and may use this for another quest. and or put a feather on it (dyeable) What do you think?
Attachments
head-tophat.png
original top hat.
head-tophat.png (1.21 KiB) Viewed 1268 times
head-tophat2.PNG
new tophat
head-tophat2.PNG (1.1 KiB) Viewed 1268 times
tophaticon2.PNG
new icon
tophaticon2.PNG (539 Bytes) Viewed 1268 times
User avatar
MrDudle
Peon
Peon
Posts: 37
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 1:42 am

Re: New Tophat with xml [FND]

Post by MrDudle » Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:30 am

I like the new one better. Looks more "real".
Image
User avatar
meway
Knight
Knight
Posts: 1736
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 6:02 am
Location: Detroit MI
Contact:

Re: New Tophat with xml [FND]

Post by meway » Wed Jun 23, 2010 5:53 am

Another version
Attachments
newprespective.PNG
newprespective.PNG (1.47 KiB) Viewed 1216 times
User avatar
Der Loisl
Peon
Peon
Posts: 51
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:47 pm
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Contact:

Re: New Tophat with xml [FND]

Post by Der Loisl » Wed Jun 23, 2010 12:19 pm

meway wrote:Another version
I prefer this one. The colors look great in my opinion. You should create a sprite sheet with it!
User avatar
meway
Knight
Knight
Posts: 1736
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 6:02 am
Location: Detroit MI
Contact:

Re: New Tophat with xml [FND]

Post by meway » Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:43 pm

Im working on it ;)
Attachments
newprespective.PNG
newprespective.PNG (4.39 KiB) Viewed 1169 times
User avatar
meway
Knight
Knight
Posts: 1736
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 6:02 am
Location: Detroit MI
Contact:

Re: New Tophat with xml [FND]

Post by meway » Wed Jun 23, 2010 10:32 pm

Here is the new top-hat sheet and a link to the xml.
http://meway.webs.com/head-tophat.xml
Edit: added screen shot of top-hat
Attachments
screeny3.PNG
old sorry for the a-a issues
screeny3.PNG (8.32 KiB) Viewed 1144 times
screeny2.PNG
new
screeny2.PNG (8.33 KiB) Viewed 1144 times
head-tophat.PNG
head-tophat.PNG (1.51 KiB) Viewed 1154 times
Last edited by meway on Wed Jun 23, 2010 11:53 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
yourmistakes
Warrior
Warrior
Posts: 695
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 7:08 am
Location: North Korea
Contact:

Re: New Tophat with xml [FND]

Post by yourmistakes » Wed Jun 23, 2010 11:37 pm

make it white, and dyable


Edit: typo
User avatar
Jaxad0127
TMW Adviser
TMW Adviser
Posts: 4209
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 6:35 pm
Location: Internet

Re: New Tophat with xml [FND]

Post by Jaxad0127 » Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:13 am

yourmistakes wrote:make it white, and dyable


Edit: typo
The band is dyeable.
Image
User avatar
baseballboy
Warrior
Warrior
Posts: 501
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 9:04 pm
Location: USA, Alabama

Re: New Tophat with xml [FND]

Post by baseballboy » Fri Jun 25, 2010 1:22 pm

Wonderful, I think I'm going to add it to my server :)
BaseBaIIBoy - 99, Zalika - 95, Mou. - 86, baseballboy - 83, Abacus - 82, Laticia - 76

<o11c> More boobs please.
User avatar
enchilado
Warrior
Warrior
Posts: 972
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 2:21 am
Location: evermore a GUY

Re: New Tophat with xml [FND]

Post by enchilado » Fri Jul 09, 2010 4:05 am

Woah, I really like the newer version. However, the perspective looks a little steep. Perhaps that's just because the playersprite's perspective is front-on, though.

I think I'd rather the perspective of the hat was off than it looked weird. If you can fix that and keep it looking great then this new top hat has my full support.
John P
Novice
Novice
Posts: 271
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 1:55 am

Re: New Tophat with xml [FND]

Post by John P » Fri Jul 09, 2010 6:23 pm

poison_ivy wrote:Woah, I really like the newer version. However, the perspective looks a little steep. Perhaps that's just because the playersprite's perspective is front-on, though.
agree
Post Reply