GARRETTtheGREAT wrote:Jaxad0127 wrote:Read my (large) post again. It was under constant risk.
I disagree with your definition of risk in this context. A risk of data loss, possibly. I'm speaking of a risk of malicious use. If Platyna lost the data by her own action, there would have been no foul play by the TMWC and I wouldn't have any grievance to address in this regard.
Well, I don't think it's fair to totally dismiss the reliability aspect. We had rollbacks of 3 days all the time on Platinum.
From a security perspective I see the following attack vectors:
- People with physical access to the server. There is no difference between the servers in this matter.
- People with ssh access to the server. We did prune the ssh keys of inactive people during the move, but I don't see this as a significant difference.
- People with ssh access to other accounts on the server. This is not an issue on the new host, since it's ours exclusively. Platinum was usually, but not always, keeping all the users in their own little sandbox, but I'm not really qualified to understand the full implications beyond "there *were* other people on localhost".
- Random people on the internet. I don't know what kind of methods Platyna used for this, but I am confident in the methods on the new host. However, I do remember the time that she broke the web registration form and I had to rewrite it (without even having ssh access at the time! that was fun ...) due to a security upgrade (Slackware is like that). There was also the time the news feed broke during general upgrades, but that wasn't specifically security-related as far as I know.
GARRETTtheGREAT wrote:
Well, I appreciate you addressing the issue regardless of how many times it has occurred (and I do mean that sincerely! Sarcasm isn't going to make this discussion useful for anyone). I had specifically asked somewhere along the many discussions for this exact answer and I was never addressed, so I think you could imagine my own frustrations at this scenario.
Yeah, we got tired after a while.
GARRETTtheGREAT wrote:As far as drama goes, there has been plenty of it after the main event as well.
One thing I'm kind of thankful for is that everyone *finally* has a taste of what it was like to face Platyna in private. But the drama is still harmful overall.
GARRETTtheGREAT wrote:I have to say, there's a lot less of it happening over on Platinum than here, Platyna's character included. I visit the forum there and no one judges me for fraternizing with this group. I come here, and I am instantly an enemy for sympathizing with Platyna. If anyone, doesn't want to like her, fine.
Well, on Platinum, there aren't many people, just a handful who are already hold a single opinion on the move (but realize that, realistically, this server is where things are).
GARRETTtheGREAT wrote:
I have a lot of interest in contributing to this game and community, but no interest in p**sing competitions.
But, I personally have a hard time working with people who want to force that on me, and who show not the slightest bit of reverence for large contributions made to the project.
It's really not hard to be involved in development without cause problems. Just: 1. Understand that, as an open-source project, your works may be alter by others, whether minimally or to the point that you can't even recognize it, and 2. Don't start any drama. Trying to force large changes is one way that leads to drama.
That's not to say it's not *possible* to push big changes through. But you'd better have a very strong logical argument behind it, and be prepared to deal with the consequences. (I did this when I was first getting into development, when I changed the server configuration from flat to nested. The only trouble I ever had with that was when, a few months later, you-can-probably-guess-who tried to run an administration script and I said "you need to change directories first" and I got a tirade about the responsibilities of developers versus sysadmins)
GARRETTtheGREAT wrote:
I can't speak for my compatriots, but for me, it would mean a lot if the TMWC would go on the record and pay a decent homage to Platyna for what she has done. If this discussion is really to be productive and not a repeat of recent threads, that's where I would start. If the TMWC is going to prove they are not going to do the exact things they strove to abolish, then I think a real discussion would be a good start for that as well.
I really doubt a thread started by Platyna, called "Digging up dirty facts about server move and the takeover.", is going to lead to us giving any sort of homage to Platyna.
And ... whenever we close a discussion, it's because the points have already been discussed to death. All of the dozen Platyna-drama threads from just after the move were by people who had already read the previous discussions, which is a violation of forum etiquette at the very least. Spamming the boards does NOT count as making a valid argument, but a surprising number of people seem to fall for it and/or believe it will work.
And, standing alone, whenever a topic is locked by a forum moderator, that is a sign that it is inappropriate to start a new topic on the subject.
Also note that
Platyna specifically rejected any compromise here:Platyna wrote:Fourth: The only position I would accept in TMW is my old position.
GARRETTtheGREAT wrote:I don't really expect any of this to happen, but then again, I didn't really expect to have a serious discussion on my personal issues with the TMWC either.
The relative lack of drama recently has definitely made it easier for us to fill our instinctive desire to try to please everybody.
Former programmer for the TMWA server.